<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft might Choose new naming scheme for Crossbow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solsie.com/2007/01/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solsie.com/2007/01/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/</link>
	<description>The Lighter Side of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolSie.com / The Lighter Side of Mobile Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; C&#8217;mon Microsoft, Meet Common Sense!..</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2007/01/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/comment-page-1/#comment-15543</link>
		<dc:creator>SolSie.com / The Lighter Side of Mobile Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; C&#8217;mon Microsoft, Meet Common Sense!..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/#comment-15543</guid>
		<description>[...] AdamaDBrown submitted an article to Brighthand&#160;discussing the new Microsoft Windows Mobile renaming. He was questioning if there&#160;was any&#160;Common Sense when the business folks at Microsoft came up with this? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AdamaDBrown submitted an article to Brighthand&nbsp;discussing the new Microsoft Windows Mobile renaming. He was questioning if there&nbsp;was any&nbsp;Common Sense when the business folks at Microsoft came up with this? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kedavix</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2007/01/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/comment-page-1/#comment-13691</link>
		<dc:creator>Kedavix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/#comment-13691</guid>
		<description>I personally think its a very bad idea, and like vicott said, will draw nothing but confusion. I don&#039;t see anything wrong with the current naming scheme as it is. Microsoft&#039;s biggest problem with me has always been that they try to be so &#039;peculiar&#039; but in actuality they&#039;re not. If they do decide to conform with this, regardless, I will continue to reference my Windows Mobile device as a &quot;Pocket PC&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think its a very bad idea, and like vicott said, will draw nothing but confusion. I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with the current naming scheme as it is. Microsoft&#8217;s biggest problem with me has always been that they try to be so &#8216;peculiar&#8217; but in actuality they&#8217;re not. If they do decide to conform with this, regardless, I will continue to reference my Windows Mobile device as a &#8220;Pocket PC&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolSie</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2007/01/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/comment-page-1/#comment-12076</link>
		<dc:creator>SolSie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/#comment-12076</guid>
		<description>I read an article about how popular the product will be depends heavily on how easy people call it. Microsoft does not understand it...

e.g. Compare iPod, Palm to 
&quot;Windows-Mobile-PocketPC-Smartphone-Touchscreen Landscape-Phone-Edition-Classic-Professional-Standards&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article about how popular the product will be depends heavily on how easy people call it. Microsoft does not understand it&#8230;</p>
<p>e.g. Compare iPod, Palm to<br />
&#8220;Windows-Mobile-PocketPC-Smartphone-Touchscreen Landscape-Phone-Edition-Classic-Professional-Standards&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicott</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2007/01/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/comment-page-1/#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>vicott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/microsoft-might-choose-new-naming-scheme-for-crossbow/#comment-12070</guid>
		<description>More confusing/non-representative/vague naming convention for Windows Mobile? Oh my gosh...And WM6 is not named in line with the version of Windows CE it is built on? When will they ever make things simpler and less confusing for consumers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More confusing/non-representative/vague naming convention for Windows Mobile? Oh my gosh&#8230;And WM6 is not named in line with the version of Windows CE it is built on? When will they ever make things simpler and less confusing for consumers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

