<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TIME magazine&#8217;s  Gadget of the Year: Peek Email Device</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/</link>
	<description>The Lighter Side of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MenoRikey</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/comment-page-1/#comment-169400</link>
		<dc:creator>MenoRikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/#comment-169400</guid>
		<description>The award was given by Time magazine, I wouldn&#039;t put too much clout into what they say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The award was given by Time magazine, I wouldn&#8217;t put too much clout into what they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/comment-page-1/#comment-169399</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/#comment-169399</guid>
		<description>$5/ month would be more reasonable, but I&#039;m convinced the &quot;Gadget of the Year&quot; award shouldn&#039;t have been given to this device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$5/ month would be more reasonable, but I&#8217;m convinced the &#8220;Gadget of the Year&#8221; award shouldn&#8217;t have been given to this device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolSie</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/comment-page-1/#comment-169398</link>
		<dc:creator>SolSie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/#comment-169398</guid>
		<description>I agree about the pricing. This could be more appealing if the device is free and subscriber only pays for the monthly service or bring it down to let say $50 and $5/month. 
The developer promises to support attachment viewing, HTML mail, Calendar...in future firmware releases</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the pricing. This could be more appealing if the device is free and subscriber only pays for the monthly service or bring it down to let say $50 and $5/month.<br />
The developer promises to support attachment viewing, HTML mail, Calendar&#8230;in future firmware releases</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/comment-page-1/#comment-169397</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/#comment-169397</guid>
		<description>But non-techie people usually don&#039;t need access to email &quot;on the go&quot;... and to pay $19.99 a month for the service?  I&#039;m still scratching my head on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But non-techie people usually don&#8217;t need access to email &#8220;on the go&#8221;&#8230; and to pay $19.99 a month for the service?  I&#8217;m still scratching my head on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolSie</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/comment-page-1/#comment-169396</link>
		<dc:creator>SolSie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/#comment-169396</guid>
		<description>Eric, the targeted audience would be just non-techie people who just want a simple device and a separate dump phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, the targeted audience would be just non-techie people who just want a simple device and a separate dump phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/comment-page-1/#comment-169395</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/2008/11/time-magazines-gadget-of-the-year-peek-email-device/#comment-169395</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think this is highly overrated.  $19.99 a month for email?  

I pay $10 for FULL INTERNET on my HTC Touch and most people have a cell phone anyways, so it&#039;s $19.99 + whatever you are paying for your cell... doesn&#039;t make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think this is highly overrated.  $19.99 a month for email?  </p>
<p>I pay $10 for FULL INTERNET on my HTC Touch and most people have a cell phone anyways, so it&#8217;s $19.99 + whatever you are paying for your cell&#8230; doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

