<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boot your Windows PC in 15 seconds with Presto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solsie.com/2009/07/boot-your-windows-pc-in-15-seconds-with-presto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solsie.com/2009/07/boot-your-windows-pc-in-15-seconds-with-presto/</link>
	<description>The Lighter Side of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramses</title>
		<link>http://solsie.com/2009/07/boot-your-windows-pc-in-15-seconds-with-presto/comment-page-1/#comment-172165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solsie.com/2009/03/boot-your-windows-pc-in-15-seconds-with-presto/#comment-172165</guid>
		<description>save $13 by simply using sleep no boot
vista resume is still slower than windows 95 but comparable to 15 seconds of presto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>save $13 by simply using sleep no boot<br />
vista resume is still slower than windows 95 but comparable to 15 seconds of presto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

